… or at least, that may be how things look soon if inflation continues doing what it has just done – rise faster than expected.  Because while my original points about base effects and so on are correct, it is no good if the actual index rises 0.6 points in a month like this.  Perhaps the VAT rise has a delayed effect.  Prices are up 0.8% since December, while VAT rose over that period by 2.5%.   But perhaps instead the economy is stronger than I expected, deflation is unlikely, and I will lose my bet with Guido.

Who is interesting and generous here about Liberal Democrat MP’s:

As Tories scream and point to Lib-Lab councils and the bearded sandal wearing activists who want to ban the bomb and legalise dope for purchase in euros, Guido says look at the reality.  Since Charlie Kennedy’s demise the LibDems have been moving quietly to the right on economics, have jettisoned a lot of their loopiest policies and the Tories under Cameron have moved towards the LibDems on civil liberties, the environment and localism

(whereas Redwood is typically hysterical about 3.4% inflation here.  Coming of age during the 1970s seems to play havoc with your sense of proportion.  Chris Giles is more nuanced here: “A little more equivocation and is once again likely. Sadly, it appears no longer a time for complacency over inflation.”

And Conway’s take is always worth reading – though I think he is wrong about how easily our debt costs could rise.  Because of long maturity funding, a 200bps rise in funding costs would not be drastic, since we don’t need to refinance soon. )

Being wrong part II: I thought following Odone’s nastiness yesterday that I could casually wander over to the Telegraph and pick up more examples of that sort of thing.  But no.  Here is Tracy Corrigan in a very forthright post about why she can’t vote for Cameron:

The fact that Clegg appears to address others as equals  suggests either that he is naturally personable or, at least in this matter, politically adept. That is quite an important skill in a political leader, and neither of the other two have it.

And here is Mary Riddell:

The one certainty of this election is that the case for electoral reform will be irrefutable. If Labour end up ahead, they may have to accelerate the plans for an AV system and House of Lords reform. That might (just) satisfy the LibDems, and the country. But Mr Cameron’s only promise of change is to cut the number of MPs, which would make the first-past-the-post system even more unfair than it is now. Nor has he any plans to oust the last of the hereditary peers. That makes the Tories not the party of change but of stasis.

Something else I am wrong about: listen to the first 5 minutes of this podcast and you learn that all three parties pay pretty serious lip service to the mistaken idea that a transactions tax is what is needed to fix finance.  They are confronted with a Robin Hood Tax campaigner who does not seem to see any serious implications from trying to raise $400bn annually from the seriously undercapitalised banking sector, and none have the courage to be remotely analytical about it.

But here finally is something I feel right about.  Marriage is not the reason children do better in married households. That was put clumsily – read the original.  It adds even more fuel to a sceptical fire burning under the Tories’ marriage tax proposals.   Here is the essence:

there are differences in development between children born to married and cohabiting couples, but this reflects differences in the sort of parents who decide to get married rather than to cohabit. For example, compared to parents who are cohabiting when their child is born, married parents are more educated, have a higher household income, and a higher occupational status, and experience a higher relationship quality early in the child’s life. It is these and other similar factors that seem to lead to better outcomes for their children.

Good to get some things right


7 thoughts on “So I get things wrong sometimes …

  1. LibDems have been moving quietly to the right on economics

    really Guido? Is it to the right to lift low-and-middle-paid workers out of tax by taxing the rich more? to the right to demand full-on nationalisation of state-mandated banks and to promote directed lending? or perhaps it’s to the right to talk about regional stock exchanges and credit unions…?

    As for Cameroons moving leftwards – just reading the last paragraph or so of this post says ‘not so much…’

      1. Yeah: I was no expert on the LD’s before now and am still not one. But my impression in 2005 was that they were way more social democratic, less liberal. If you look up pre 2007 articles about Vince, they are all about how he was hoping to wrestle them round towards liking markets

  2. Cameron’s moved a little towards the centre, but if Cameron doesn’t win the Tories will implode (again). So expect to see their policies on the environment and civil liberties to be ditched if that happens. As Alex Massie has pointed out on his blog, the right have started saying that Cameron isn’t winning because he wasn’t right wing enough.

      1. Their welfare policy is actually worse than that. Reckon they can take 500,000 off incapacity benefit onto regular jobseeker’s allowance:


        They also propose privatizing the provision of this welfare:


        i.e. corporatism at its finest.

        And their manifesto proposes “make-work” programs:

        “So, with the Conservatives, long-term benefit claimants who fail to find work will be required to ‘work for the dole’ on community work programmes.”

        That’s what they’ll be doing when they’re ring fencing the NHS.

      2. Yes, Mrs.Thatcher set her tone for the unemployed: pick up litter in Liverpool,-and i am convinced that mind-set still exists in the Tory party.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s